Mastrick writes: Hi Gene, Regarding your most recent post “Why Does Vivid Keep Sucking Up to This broad? OctoMom Offered Free Porn Star Nannies:”

I am also perplexed by Vivid’s apparent fascination with Octo-Mom. I
would be less surprised if Robert Hill had interest, he’s always been on
the avant-garde side of the industry. But Vivid?

This woman is more deserved of my concern and sympathies than my erotic
interest – she obviously has issues and it’s really sad to see what’s
happening with those poor kids. Some of them already have birth-related
handicaps and it’s likely that some of the octuplets will also suffer
from maladies such as multiple sclerosis. What’s sexy about that?

I don’t understand Steve Hirsch’s apparent preoccupation with this
circus act, perhaps I’m missing something. Why doesn’t Vivid spend $50K
to $100K doing a first boy-girl with a woman who’s actually pretty such
as Justine Joli, Karlie Montana or Felecia? Now that I’d spend money to
see…but Octo-Mom? Fuggedaboutit.

Best regards,

Mastrick