DeBella replies to the following article www.adultfyi.com/read.php?ID=26652

DeBella writes: I am a firm believer in freedom of speech and welcome the opportunity to respond.

One thing about freedom of speech it that is an awesome responsibility you take on when you try to say knowingly untruthful things with the intent to discredit, libel and slander persons in media print.

People in the Industry that really know me, know I never lie or misrepresent anything. Furthermore, I would never take advantage of anyone for any reason. It’s against my basic make up. But what I have learned is to keep all e-mails, text messages and transfer voice mails to tape. So any rebuttal I make here to Larin Lane’s comments has a factual basis for it, I have documentation to support it and people to testify to it.

I am the License Holder of Generation XXX Productions. I am a State of California Department of Labor Standards Enforcement Licensed Talent Agency and my license number is 48985.

If “Shy Love” [pictured] and “Adult Talent Managers” has been managing Larin Lane since July 2007 she is doing so in violation of California State law. If anyone checks with the DLSE Licensing Board they will find Shy Love does not have a current operating license in the name Shy Love, Adult Talent Managers or in the name Sheelah Blumberg. You will also find “There was not even a license application on file for any of those names”.

According to the State of California statue none of the contracts signed by Ms Love or representatives of her unlicensed talent agency has any legal standing and are non-enforceable.

Ms Lane approached me to sign with the Agency on 12/22/08. She was given a State of California Approved Exclusive Contract. My contracts are conformed to the state requirements and my master contracts have the state seal and approval stamp. Which are fully enforceable and required for use by licensed talent agencies. So according to the State of California statue we are the only ones authorized to represent Ms Lane currently and collect booking fees.

On one occasion Ms Lane requested me to call my ex-husband Larry Schwarz of Red Light Distribution to make sure that Shy Love was denied access to her most recent check and that the check for her most recent work was sent to Larin’s home and not Shy’s. This is not behavior of an individual that is being threatened or not voluntarily requesting her Agent for assistance.

Ms Lane joined the agency at a time during the Christmas Holiday when many of the studios were winding down and getting ready for AVN. Ms Lane and her boy friend KJ had no way to AVN, so I purchased his ticket for entry and had one of our sponsors pay for hers. She agreed to work for 2 hrs at the convention at the sponsor booth. Because of all of her personal problems she had once she got to Las Vegas, she never finished her commitment to the company that purchased her pass. She was never asked to reimburse the sponsor for her breech of the agreement.

After reading Ms Lane’s comments posted here in the article, I have received calls from two other persons that were at AVN and overheard Ms Lane saying “Shy was going to black list her if she left the Shy’s agency.” So I am confused or Ms Lane’s memory impaired????

Until we returned from AVN there were no problems. Once back from AVN Shy Love went on a campaign to get Ms Lane back to her unlicensed agency making Ms Lane promises of work. This was according to statement Lain made to several people including directly to me.

Ms Lane stated directly to me and one other person affiliated with Generation XXX Productions that Shy had told her “that she (Shy), had told various studios that She (Ms Lane) was on vacation and was coming back to her (Shy)”. This created a problem to book Ms Lane, as the directors were confused as to who really represented her.

No one from Generation XXX Productions has called any studios or directors and told them not to hire Ms Lane. I have over three hundred e-mails saved where I have sent directors soliciting work for Larin. Ms Lane has turned bookings down and not returned any of my calls or answer text or e-mails.

Ms Lane. must not be getting her emails or some one is intercepting those e-mails. We have kept copies of the multiple bookings that were sent to her. I have an obligation to notify the talent when they are requested by a director/producer and there is a booking available and how much that booking is. If Ms Lane refuses that booking, that’s on her. Ms Lane has turned down a recent booking for Jewel De’Nyle’s latest high selling movie line. Ms Lane also turned down a part in a “feature” because her boy friend KJ was removed from the production.

No one has ever threatened Ms Lane.

Prior to this article there has been no attempt to litigate or enforce any of the breech of contract by me. I have only tried to hold her accountable for her commitments. I have suggested to her that if she and her friend KJ want to continue to disregard their contract and continue not to accept bookings, they should hire a attorney and let the courts settle this. Instead Ms Lane elected to air her unfounded accusations in the “Court of Public Opinion”.